<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for me techie...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metechie.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>ramblings on technology ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking of changing blog host&#8230; by yOOrek</title>
		<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>yOOrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>zzzzzzzzzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zzzzzzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking of changing blog host&#8230; by Raghav</title>
		<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Raghav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Still thinking... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still thinking&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking of changing blog host&#8230; by yOOrek</title>
		<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>yOOrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/thinking-of-changing-blog-host/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>So are u switching or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are u switching or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Frustration working with computers&#8230; by yOOrek</title>
		<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/frustration-working-with-computers/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>yOOrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metechie.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/frustration-working-with-computers/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Been there, done that already. Actually I don&#039;t know if you realized this but I am one of the guys in that movie clip. Can you guess which one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been there, done that already. Actually I don&#8217;t know if you realized this but I am one of the guys in that movie clip. Can you guess which one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apache Experience on Ubuntu@HP 6710b by Raghav</title>
		<link>http://metechie.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/apache-experience-on-ubuntuhp-6710b/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Raghav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metechie.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/apache-experience-on-ubuntuhp-6710b/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Later I have found out that Ubuntu has indeed a customized version of apache 2.2.3 packaged for themselves.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It has a different directory tree structure, and different configuration file name/locations.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;e.g. the conventional httpd.conf is now a zero byte file, and the one config file that is used is called apache2.conf.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Furthermore, as against having all configuration data in a single httpd.conf file, the configuration is now distributed in separate configuration files for each virtual host. The one virtual host that is active by default is also known as default.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The configuration files for such virtual hosts are arranged in two directories. sites-available and sites-enabled, latter one normally having links to the first one to allow that virtual host to function.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then each virtual host can be configured using its own config file, an xml transformation of the good old httpd.conf.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The default htdocs (old convention) is not in /var/www (or something like that) but is equally easily configurable from the respective virtual hosts&#039; config file.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Its not such a bad arrangement after all, once you have to dig through all of it and understand.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Let me just clarify about the original post, I didn&#039;t mean anything negative about the new arrangement/customizations, whatever negativity was visible (if any) must have been due to the frustration out of not meeting the expectation (of getting to see the much seen old configuration mechanism).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All in all, a customization, though not bad at all. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;kudos to thinkers behind this.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;cheers&lt;br/&gt;raghav..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later I have found out that Ubuntu has indeed a customized version of apache 2.2.3 packaged for themselves.</p>
<p>It has a different directory tree structure, and different configuration file name/locations.</p>
<p>e.g. the conventional httpd.conf is now a zero byte file, and the one config file that is used is called apache2.conf.</p>
<p>Furthermore, as against having all configuration data in a single httpd.conf file, the configuration is now distributed in separate configuration files for each virtual host. The one virtual host that is active by default is also known as default.</p>
<p>The configuration files for such virtual hosts are arranged in two directories. sites-available and sites-enabled, latter one normally having links to the first one to allow that virtual host to function.</p>
<p>Then each virtual host can be configured using its own config file, an xml transformation of the good old httpd.conf.</p>
<p>The default htdocs (old convention) is not in /var/www (or something like that) but is equally easily configurable from the respective virtual hosts&#8217; config file.</p>
<p>Its not such a bad arrangement after all, once you have to dig through all of it and understand.</p>
<p>Let me just clarify about the original post, I didn&#8217;t mean anything negative about the new arrangement/customizations, whatever negativity was visible (if any) must have been due to the frustration out of not meeting the expectation (of getting to see the much seen old configuration mechanism).</p>
<p>All in all, a customization, though not bad at all. </p>
<p>kudos to thinkers behind this.</p>
<p>cheers<br />raghav..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
